「长篇译文」回顾经典:Headfonics测评世界首款分立R2R播放器——P6软件&音质篇

乐彼客服1

上接《开箱&概述篇》：http://www.erji.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2265343&extra=

---

LUXURY & PRECISION P6 SOFTWARE

SOFTWARE

(Reviewed firmware version 1.0.0.6)

The P6 OS I presume is some sort of Linux framework with a proprietary coding layer on top for UI. In layman’s terms, it is quite a simple UI with linear information flow, lightly colored, and with the ability to display artwork on the main playback screen. Since there is no touch capability the simple way is perhaps the wisest way to go to avoid button mashing frustration.

Actually, if you are coming from the likes of the LP3 Pro then it’s a similar experience except without the touch capability which means some icon layers in corners are gone and instead you have a list-based ‘information card’ flow with text prompts that are accessible via the navigation wheel and command buttons.

The plus side is speed and stability which are both very good. The bootup time into the home menu screen is around 5 seconds from a long press and about 2 seconds to power off. I suspect the stability is from the code being relatively mature since LP has been using a version of this for years.

The speed is from its generally light and breezy resource demands on the CPU. As for the CPU itself, I have no data but my guess is an Ingenic x1000 or something similar which tends to work very well for smaller OS like this.

乐彼P6软件篇

软件

（测评固件版本为1.0.0.6）

我推测P6操作系统是某种Linux框架，上面有一个用于用户界面的专有编码层。通俗地说，这是一个相当简单的用户界面，具有线性信息流，界面是浅色的，并能在主播放屏幕上显示专辑封面。由于没有触摸功能，简单的系统处理也许是最明智的方式，以避免纯按键操作的挫败感。

实际上，如果你用过LP3 Pro（勘误，型号应该为L3 Pro）这样的产品，那么P6也是一种类似的体验，只是没有触摸功能，这意味着边角处的一些图标层没有了，取而代之的是一个基于列表的 "信息卡 "流程，其中有文字提示，可通过导航滚轮和命令按键访问。

好的一面，是速度和稳定性都非常好。从长按到进入主菜单屏幕的启动时间约为5秒，关闭电源约为2秒。我怀疑稳定性是由于代码相对成熟，因为乐彼已经使用这个版本很多年了。

速度快是来自于其通常对CPU的资源需求都很轻量化。至于CPU本身，我没有数据，但我猜测是君正x1000或类似的东西，这对像这样的小型操作系统来说往往可以运行得非常好。



NAVIGATION

Non-touch navigation is almost always linear or single direction, either drilling down or returning to the main menu. The P6 is no different in that regard with its hybrid scroll and command button navigation system.

What you are looking for here is adherence to old design principles of no more than 3 clicks to get where you want to go and a fast way to get back out. You are also hoping to avoid cul de sacs which the P6 UI does rather well.

For example, so quickly go to playback and resume play is one click, to adjust USB functionality when connected is 3 clicks, and to change the EQ preset is 2 clicks. All are within the norms or standards I would expect for good UI design for non-touch.

At any point in the system, you can get back to the main screen with a long press of the return command function button which makes media navigation a lot easier if your folder structure is deep.

Probably the only worrying aspect is any card that has a very long list in the media library causing you to endlessly scroll on that shortish IPS screen. For example, the song media manager section with 50-10k songs would be a few minutes of solid scrolling. How much strain that will put on the potentiometers volume control and electrical relay performance over the long term I am not sure.

导航

非触摸式导航几乎总是线性或单一方向的，要么向里层钻，要么返回主菜单。P6在这方面也不例外，它用了滚轮滚动和命令按键混合式的导航系统。

你在这里将会发现的是P6遵守旧的设计原则，即点击不超过3次就能到达你想去的地方，并能快速返回。你还希望避免出现P6用户界面做得相当好的死胡同。

例如，快速进入播放和恢复播放是一次点击，连接时调整USB功能是三次点击，改变EQ预设是两次点击。所有这些都在我对非触控的良好用户界面设计所期望的规范或标准之内。

在系统的任何时候，你都可以通过长按返回命令功能按键回到主屏幕，如果你的文件夹结构很深，就会使得媒体导航更容易。

唯一令人担忧的方面，可能是媒体库中的任何歌单都有很长的列表，导致你在那个短小的IPS屏幕上无休止地滚动。例如，如果曲库里有50-1万首歌曲，就将需要几分钟的滚动时间。我不确定这对电位器的音量控制和电气继电器的长期性能会造成多大的压力。



PLAYBACK

I have to admit I like the playback screen layout. It’s a fresh approach with a mix of small and large data blocks that look like an unfinished Tetris game underneath some lavish peak meter animations. Shying away from miniaturized text data makes reading the P6 playback screen without eye strain a joy.

The code/bit rate data is huge as well as eye-catching when songs are not in play. It is most likely the first thing you will see when glancing at the screen. Once the music kicks in the top right and left peak meters animate, flowing up and down depending on the track as you would expect.

Your overall volume indicator is just below in a thin red line but you can also see it in a numerical format in the top navigation bar alongside your battery life and play status icons.

There are some washed-out gray data blocks below and beside it the track sample rate display. A gray EQ indicator that changes depending on the present and tells you also which frequency bands are emphasized is to the left.

Track metadata is also below in grey including song title, file format, and time played. The length of time of the track plus the artist’s name is in white so the block has some aesthetical contrast.

DRAWBACKS

Most of the drawbacks are really related to the lack of immediacy that comes with a touchscreen and the ability to change something on the fly. The UI tends to demand you think 1-2 steps ahead like a pool player rather than the reactive safety net vibe of Android’s myriad of in-play options.

For example, by holding the command button during playback or in the media library you can add tracks to playlists but you have to have created the empty playlist first to complete that action. Another example is playback order such as shuffle or loop also needs to be preset from a play mode option in the main settings menu and cannot be accessed directly from playback.

回放

我不得不承认我喜欢这块回放屏幕的布局。这是一种新鲜的方法，在某个令人印象颇深的峰值计量动画界面下方，混合了大大小小的数据块，看起来就像一个未完成的俄罗斯方块游戏。规避了小型化文本数据，使得观看P6回放屏幕时不会出现眼睛疲劳的情况。

编码/比特率显示占比是巨大的，而且在歌曲没有播放时也很醒目。它很可能是你瞥见屏幕时看到的第一件事。一旦音乐响起，上方标了左右声道的峰值计量表就会出现，根据你所期望的那样，随着音轨上下变化。

整个音量显示就在下面的一条细红线上，但你也可以在顶部导航栏中看到它的数字格式，上面还有电池寿命和播放状态的图标。

再往下，有一些冲淡的灰色数据块，旁边是音轨采样率显示。左边有一个灰色的EQ指标，它根据当前情况而变化，并告诉你哪些频段在被强调。

音轨的元数据也在下方，以灰色显示，包括歌曲名称、文件格式和播放时间。音轨的时间长度和艺术家的名字是白色字体，所以这个区块会有一些美学上的视觉对比感。

缺点

大多数的缺点都与缺少触屏所带来的即时性，以及在匆忙中改变一些东西的能力有关。它的用户界面倾向于要求你像台球运动员一样提前1-2步思考，而不是像安卓系统环境那样，有无数的播放状态的可选项，从而构成可以即时反应的安全网。

例如，在播放过程中或在媒体库中按住命令按键，你就可以将曲目添加到播放列表中，但你必须先创建空的播放列表才能完成这一动作。另一个例子是播放顺序，如随机播放或循环播放，也需要从主设置菜单的播放模式选项中预设，不能直接从播放界面里访问。



FEATURES

Despite the graphical simplicity and linear navigation, the P6 does have some very useful features within the OS. You will find all of them within the system settings including EQ options, audio output presets which control analog and digital settings as well as environmental and BT options.

AUDIO OUTPUT

This is probably your most operationally relevant set of options on the P6 and mostly covered the output mode of the analog jacks as well as your digital filtering and gain controls.

You get two gain controls with the P6, high and low which also act as the voltage switch for the lineout options from the same jacks. You can switch between the two output modes from the same output settings menu.

At the very bottom of the audio output settings menu is the final switch option to change to SPDIF output. Logically I would have liked to have seen that merged with the LO/PO option menu. Logically, it seems to be a better fit inside a single output selector menu. It also removes one more yes no menu item from the main menu list to scroll down to.

You can also pick between 5 different filter options, select native or DSD to PCM decoding as well as choose DoP over your SPDIF output.

特点

尽管图示简单且导航线性，P6的操作系统中确实还有一些非常有用的功能。你可以在系统设置中找到所有这些功能，包括均衡器选项、控制模拟和数字设置的音频输出预设，以及高级设定和蓝牙选项。

音频输出

这可能是P6上与操作最相关的一组选项，主要包括模拟口的输出模式以及数字滤波还有增益控制。

P6有两个增益控制，高和低，这也是同一接口的线路输出选项的电压切换开关。你可以在同一个输出设置菜单中切换这两种输出模式。

在音频输出设置菜单的最下方是最后的开关选项，可以切换到SPDIF输出。从逻辑上讲，我希望能看到它与LO/PO选项菜单合并。从逻辑上讲，它似乎更适合在一个单一的输出选择菜单中。它还从主菜单列表中删除了一个需要向下滚动的 "是 "或 "否 "菜单项目。

你还可以在5个不同的过滤器选项中选择，选择本地或DSD到PCM解码，以及在SPDIF输出上选择DoP。



EQUALIZER

The EQ seems to be an 8-band option with up to 6 presets, one of which is ‘EQ off” or flat. When I say seems to be that because you do not have any ability to customize the EQ to your own preferences or offer custom presets. The presets are all you have brother.

You can see which preset is activated in the playback screen with the GUI showing the adjusted frequency gain over an 8 band stretch hence the assumption there are 8 points in the FR being considered.

As to how well the EQ performs that is down to personal preference and for me, I would choose 3 out of the 6 with off being the number 1 as it sounds more natural and with less gain attenuation.

If you feel the stock sound is too smooth then jazz is a nice alternative. It thins it out a bit but produces a nice clean sound. Rock is fun, thins out, and dips the mids in favor of that classic V-shaped bass and treble contrast. It can sound powerful and exciting but at the cost of some mids presence.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS

Aside from your usual display, language, and sleep options for battery management, the P6 OS also allows you to manage your USB setup inside the advanced settings menu.

You actually have 3 different USB options for the P6. There first is a connection mode, similar to Android though again you have to pre-plan in advance of connecting as it’s not an intelligent automatic thing.  You have two choices, MSC for file transfer or USB-DAC input.

USB-Audio latency can also be controlled via a long or short option with the final option a choice between allowing the power supply to be from the USB connection or the battery inside the P6 when connected.

均衡器

EQ似乎是一个8段调节的选项，有6个预设，其中一个是 "EQ关闭 "或平坦。我觉得这么设计是因为你可能没能力根据自己喜好来定制EQ。如果发生这种情况，那么兄弟，预设就是你的一切。

你可以在回放屏幕上看到哪个预设选项被激活，图形用户界面显示了在8个频段上调整的频段增益，上面有8个关键频点被确定。

至于均衡器的性能如何，这取决于个人的偏好，对我来说，我会选择6个中的3个，其中关闭是第1个，因为它听起来更自然，增益衰减更少。

如果你觉得原有的声音太光滑，那么爵士乐模式是个不错的选择。它能使声音变薄一些，但能产生一个很棒且干净的声音。摇滚乐模式很有趣，它能使声音变薄，并使中频略凹，有利于经典的V形风格的低频、高频形成鲜明对比。它可以让人听起来充满力量感和兴奋感，但要以牺牲一些中频的存在为代价。

高级设定

除了通常的显示、语言和电池管理的睡眠选项外，P6操作系统还允许你在高级设置菜单内管理你的USB设置。

实际上，你对P6会有3个不同的USB选项。首先是连接模式，类似于安卓系统，尽管你必须在连接前预先计划，因为它不是一个智能化自动化的东西。 你有两个选择，MSC用于文件传输或USB-DAC输入模式。

USB-Audio延迟设置也可以通过选择长延时或短延时两种选项来控制，最后一个选项是在连接时允许从USB连接或P6内部的电池供电。



MEDIA MANAGEMENT

You can dig in and manage your media via two routes, the directory option which is the basic folder and file navigation, and through the meta library options.

DIRECTORY

The folder and file drill works just like any other DAP that offers the same options and the drill-down and selecting is fast. Just be aware there is a 12000 file limit so it is possible not all of your card contents will show up if you have more.

You also have a secondary menu option by long-pressing the command button to allow you to add the files to playlists or delete the files altogether.

META LIBRARY

The meta library has almost the exact functionality as the drill-down file explorer with except it organizes everything more succinctly under the usual categories of artist, album, and all music, (songs). Unfortunately, the drill-down is a bit too flat for me with artist selection going straight into all the songs rather than grouping them by albums then songs.

It is also missing a genre option but personally, I have never been satisfied with most DAP OS genre management. Only a few offer proper genre-artist-album-song drill down so not having it is fine by me. The artist one would be more important in my everyday use and it does need that second album layer to drill down into properly.

Long pressing on an individual track will give you the option to add that track to a playlist that you can then access in its own area in the media library. However, you cannot delete the actual track in the meta library like you can in the file browser.

PLAYLISTS

Playlists have their own section where you can add and delete but sadly you cannot rename the playlists so if you manage a ton of them you will have to memorize what’s in them via a 1,2,3 etc… naming sequence. Not ideal.

文件管理

你可以通过两种途径挖掘和管理你的曲库，目录列表选项是基本的文件夹和文件导航，以及通过元数据库选项。

目录列表

进入文件夹和文件的工作方式与其他提供相同选项的DAP一样，进入和选择的速度也很快。只是要注意有12000个文件数量的限制，所以如果你有更多首歌曲，有可能不是所有的歌单内容都会显示出来。

你还可以通过长按命令按键进行二级菜单选择，允许你将文件添加到播放列表或完全删除文件。

元数据库

元数据库的功能几乎与下探式文件资源管理器完全一样，只是它在艺术家、专辑和所有音乐（歌曲）等通常类目下更简洁地组织了所有内容。不幸的是，对我来说，进入下级的功能有点过于平淡，艺术家选择直接进入所有的歌曲，而不是按专辑和歌曲分组。

它还缺少一个音乐流派选项，但就我个人而言，我对大多数DAP操作系统的流派管理从未感到满意。只有少数人提供适当的流派--艺术家--专辑--歌曲的层级，所以没有这个选项对我来说是好的。在我的日常使用中，艺术家那部分更重要，而且它确实需要第二层专辑层来正确到达下一级。

长按一个单独的音轨，你可以选择将该音轨添加到一个播放列表中，然后你可以在媒体库中自己所建的区域内访问。然而，你不能像在文件浏览器中那样，直接在元数据库中删除实际的曲目。

播放列表

播放列表有自己的区域，你可以进行添加和删除操作，但遗憾的是，你不能重命名播放列表，所以如果你管理了大量的播放列表，你将不得不通过1,2,3等命名顺序来记住其中的内容。这并不理想。



WIRELESS OPTIONS

Bluetooth on the P6 is in receiver mode only and cannot transmit so there is no bi-directional capability quite as you will find in Android DAPs. That means a very simple UI navigation to the Bluetooth menu in the system settings to either turn it on or off.

You also have an option to clear ‘the pairing record’ which might mean there is an internal pairing limit for receiving. All pairing is done at your source transmitter side such as a smartphone or another DAP.

Once paired it will automatically show a BT logo on a black background with the codec being received and the sample rate in the bottom right corner. It also shows what the receiving source is, in this case, a Samsung Note 9. Nothing more required really for receiving, very neat and tidy.

BLUETOOTH PERFORMANCE

PAIRING

No operational issues here. Turn on the P6 Bluetooth, turn on your source transmitting BT device, and scan and it should see a single P6 label.

Pairing is immediate after once confirmed and you do have the option on the likes of Samsung to select LDAC quality or go for a balanced transmission and the P6 will receive both. The actual codec will be shown on the P6 screen when active including the source device, sample, and bit rates.

My one request would be able to see what devices the P6 has paired with historically. You do get the chance to clear the pairing records but what it has stored is a complete mystery.

STABILITY & RANGE

The P6 range is actually very good and competitive against most Android DAPs. Using LDAC I can get about 9m away from a smartphone transmitting before signal quality gets a bit patchy and starts dropping out.

Downgrading to SBC I can go the full 10m-11m that I usually get with an average TWS setup though to be honest the level of resolution and dynamic range from a non LDAC signal is not up to par for my tastes.

LATENCY

The latency on the P6 BT connection is really tight. With it connected wirelessly to a Windows 10 Acer laptop using high bitrate media files, I could not detect any looseness in the audio sync.

YouTube and Netflix were also excellent performers for audio sync, unlike TWS which can show a little frustrating lag in lip-syncing on platforms where audio sync tools are not available.

无线选项

P6上的蓝牙只处于接收模式，不能发射，所以没有双向功能，就像你在安卓DAP上看到的那样。这意味着在系统设置中的蓝牙菜单上有一个非常简单的UI导航，可以打开或关闭蓝牙。

你还可以选择清除 "配对记录"，这可能意味着接收时有一个内部配对限制。所有的配对都是在你的源发射器一侧完成的，如智能手机或另一台DAP。

用三星Note 9连，一旦配对成功，P6将自动显示一个黑色背景的蓝牙符号标志，右下角显示正在接收的编解码器和采样率。它还显示接收源是什么。对于接收端来说，真的不需要什么了，非常简洁。

蓝牙性能

配对

此处没有操作问题。打开P6蓝牙，打开你的蓝牙源发射端，然后查找，它应该会搜到一个单一的P6标签。

一旦确认后，立即进行配对，你可以在三星等产品上选择LDAC质量或选择平衡传输，P6将同时接收这两种信号。当激活时，实际的编解码器将显示在P6屏幕上，包括源设备、采样和比特率。

我的一个要求是能看到P6在历史记录上与哪些设备配对过。你确实有机会清除配对记录，但它储存了什么完全是个谜。

连接稳定性和覆盖范围

P6的蓝牙覆盖范围实际上非常好，与大多数安卓DAP相比具有竞争力。使用LDAC连，在信号质量变得有点不稳定并开始下降之前，我可以在离智能手机大约9米远的地方进行传输。

降级到SBC协议，我可以走满10米-11米，我通常用一个普通的TWS设置，尽管说实话，非LDAC信号的解析力和动态范围水平都不符合我的口味。

延迟

P6的蓝牙连接模式的延迟真的很少。通过无线连接到Windows 10宏碁笔记本电脑，使用高比特率媒体文件，我检测不到音频同步的任何迟滞。

用油管和网飞时的音频同步表现也很好，不像TWS在没有音频同步工具的平台上，语音同步会出现一点令人沮丧的滞后。



P6 SOUND IMPRESSIONS

(Tested using an Empire Ears Odin, Noble Audio Sultan, qdc Anole VX, and Campfire Audio’s Ara).

SUMMARY

The P6 stock sound is special. It makes going non-touch for controls worthwhile. I thought I had heard something magical with the R2R2000 and whilst is still rate its performance as world-class, the P6 is a different and altogether more embracing sound.

This is a very natural almost analog tone but also an incredibly detailed sound signature. It has excellent solidity and density on the low-end, a broad instrumental and vocal note through the mids, and a light fade on the treble without any loss of headroom. And the dynamic range, oh my, just wonderful considering it does not have to rely on high contrast bass and treble parlor tricks.

In every IEM we tested, the P6 sounded sure-footed, powerful but with excellent resolution. However, compared to all our delta-sigma implemented DAPs the detail was not so much personified by the complexity in the arrangements, super-wide spacing, or ethereal treble complexity.

Nope, it was not on the outside of the note, but rather on the ‘inside’, metaphorically speaking. The P6 shines brightest with how it resolves and delivers the texture within each individual note. Be it voicing, string plucks, percussion brushes, or kick-drums down low, every note was broad, rich, and heavily textured to create some wonderful character therein.

TIMBRE

That’s the key to R2R implementations for me, they tend to make a delta-sigma alternative sound a little glossy and almost too perfect in how they project detail within each individual sound. The P6 is grittier, more involving, and throws all sorts of nuanced variations into the mix.

For example, single-string violin plucks have such broad strokes in their timbre that you can easily pick out the intentional roughness in lower G string strikes or the more mellow vibration on higher-scale A-string tones.

Those looking for a more metallic high-frequency brightness from E-string notes will find the P6 does tone it down a touch with far less chance of any nasty partial overtones. This is not a timbre that goes heavy on any upper-harmonic presence so your ear will be drawn more to the mids and low-end for harmonic coloration.

Of course, the degree of variation on the above will depend on the gear you have paired the P6 too but even finely balanced signatures such as the strong upper-mids presence of the Empire Ears Odin never felt off-course or overcooked when paired with the P6.

If there is one take away from the timbral qualities of the P6 signature and that is dynamic drivers performance within monitors, be it sole or hybrid. They tended to do better with the P6 than pure BA designs for bass texture.

The more texture you can deliver the better the P6 sounds and dynamic drivers trend to offer more than BA which, for me, is about articulation and technical excellence.

STAGING

The P6 has some excellent depth and staging width with a “big vocal’ sound. The crossfeed and overall imaging remind me more of a natural stage environment rather than a big and airy arena type soundstage. This has less of an emphasis on pushing out really far and wide like some closet HD800 homage and more into a live concert feel.

A lot of that has to do with the mids presentation. Combined with that broad and heavily textured midrange instrumental and a forward vocal positioning it sounds close without the connection that can often come with that description.

That bodes well for vocal lovers who are sensitive to shouty abrasive colorations when they are pushed forward. Here they sound euphonic, ‘big’ but smooth but also contribute to a more centered and depth focused imaging quality.

Treble airiness and headroom are very good but it is not as forward or as sparkling as something like the R2R2000 Black or Lotoo’s PAW Gold Touch. It does have a gentle fade which in turn contributes to that more liquid and smoother sound from the mids downwards.

BLUETOOTH SOUND IMPRESSIONS

I think it’s really important to use the P6 in LDAC mode to get the most out of the wireless connection. For a player that places all its trump cards into smooth sound quality, using an SBC or even aptX level transmission will lead to an unacceptable loss in dynamic range leaving the presentation annoyingly compressed and flat sounding.

Even aptX robs the P6 of some much-needed headroom and throw in some unwanted bloom into that well-controlled low-end. LDAC is much better and you will hear that treble presence return right away fleshing out the soundstage a lot better and improving the perceived level of resolution immensely.

In terms of tonal change going LDAC, the general smooth tone remains but there are some nuanced differences. For example, the treble seems a little sharper, and the mid-range timbre a little lighter in vocals. Sibilance has a slighter harder edge for female vocals and percussion work marginally splashier.

The dynamic range does take a hit, but that should be unsurprising given just how excellent the wired performance is. The killer low-end that sounds softer and less impactful and little imaging clues such as a peripheral finger click not grabbing my attention as much.

P6的声音印象

(使用Empire Ears Odin、Noble Audio Sultan、qdc Anole VX和Campfire Audio的Ara进行测试）。

总结

P6的声音很特别。它让非触摸式的控制值得一试。我以为我听到了R2R2000的神奇之处，虽然我仍然认为后者的性能是世界一流的，但P6是一个不同的以及完完全全更加包容的声音。

这是一个非常自然的几乎是纯模拟的声音，但也具备了一个令人难以置信的详充满细节的声音特性。它在低频上有很好的稳定性和密度感，在中频上有宽广的乐器和人声音色，在高频上有轻微的淡化，没有任何空间感损失。而动态范围，哦，我的天，考虑到它不必依赖高对比度的高低频两端拉伸的小把戏，实在是太好了。

在我们测试的每一个IEM搭配中，P6听起来都很稳健、有力，但具有出色的解析力。然而，与我们所有的delta-sigma解码架构的DAP相比，它的细节并没有那种高集成度芯片机型那么突出，也没有超宽的间距以及空灵的高频细节。

不，打个比方，这不是在音符外面，而是在 "音符里"。P6最耀眼的地方是它如何处理和传递每个音符的质地。无论是人声、弦乐、打击乐，还是底下的踏板鼓，每个音符都很宽广、丰富，并有大量的纹理感，创造出一些美妙的特性。

音色

这就是R2R架构于我之关键。作为delta-sigma的替代品，它们听起来会有点光泽感，在每个单独的音符中所投射出来的细节，简直太完美。P6的音色更逼真，更有代入感，并抛出各种细微的变化把它们融为一体。

例如，单弦小提琴的弹奏在音色表达时具有如此广泛的笔触，你可以很容易地挑出较低的G弦敲击时那种刻意的粗糙感，或者在较高的A弦音色中找到更醇厚的振动声。

那些想从E弦的音符中寻找更多具有金属感的高频亮度的人，会发现P6确实把它调低了一些，而且减少了任何讨厌的部分频域泛音的机会。这不是一个重于任何高次谐波的音色，所以你的耳朵会更多地被中频和低频的谐波色彩所吸引。

当然，上述变化的程度将取决于你与P6搭配的设备，但即使是驱动标杆级别的平衡耳塞，如中高频表现强劲的Empire Ears Odin，与P6搭配时，也不会感到偏离轨道或过分刺激。

如果说从P6音色特征中可以看出什么的话，那就是在IEM里动圈耳塞的表现。无论是单动圈还是圈铁混合。与纯动铁入耳相比，它们与P6搭配出的低频质感表现得更好。

耳塞能提供的纹理感越多，P6听起来就越棒，而且动圈能提供给我的会比动铁更多，对我来说，在于音色的衔接和卓越的素质。

声场

P6有一些很好的深度和舞台宽度，具有 "大嗓门"一般的人声。左右声道的交叉馈送和整体结像力让我勾勒起了一个自然的舞台环境，而不是一个巨大空旷的舞台类型的声场。这台机器并不会像致敬HD800那样把一切元素都往外推得很远很宽，而是更强调一种现场音乐会的感觉。

这种声场特质，很大程度上与中频表现有关。再加上宽广而富质感的中频乐器和靠前的人声定位，它听起来会更靠得很近，且没有那种经常伴随着的乐器人声相互黏连的感觉。

这对那些对被推到前面大喊大叫的粗鲁音色敏感的人声爱好者来说是个好兆头。在P6这儿，这些靠前的人声听起来都会很亲切，"结像大"而音色顺滑，但也有助于形成一个更集中的、有深度的结像质量。

高频的空气感和空间感非常好，但它不像黑太子或Lotoo墨菊那样前凸或明亮。它确实有一种柔和的淡化处理效果，这反过来有助于体现从下方中频开始所呈现的更多水润感以及更顺滑的声音。

蓝牙声音印象

我认为在LDAC模式下使用P6是非常重要的，可以最大限度地发挥无线连接的作用。对于一个把所有王牌都放在顺滑音质上的播放器来说，使用SBC甚至aptX级别的传输会导致动态范围的不可接受的损失，这样会呈现出令人讨厌的被压缩且偏于平坦的声音。

甚至aptX协议也会使P6失去一些亟需的空间感，并在控制良好的低频中加入一些不必要的染色。用LDAC就要好得多，你会马上听到高频回来了，声场被充实了，并极大地提高了可感知到的解析力水平。

就LDAC协议的音调变化而言，本地模式下P6流畅的音调仍然存在，但也有一些细微的差别。例如，高频似乎有点尖锐，人声的中频音色有点轻。女声的咝咝声有一点发硬的边缘，打击乐的处理也略微突兀一些。

动态范围确实也受到了打击，但考虑到P6有线模式性能有多么出色，这应该是不奇怪的。原本杀手级的低频听起来更柔和了些，冲击力更小，偏小的结像线索就像指尖轻点一般，没有那么吸引我的注意力。

乐彼客服1

《搭配&对比篇》已更新：http://www.erji.net/forum.php?mo ... =2266144&extra=